Telling Stories, Connecting Communities

Author: admin (Page 3 of 3)

Hosiery Mills Come South

In the early twentieth century, hosiery mills began to sprout up in communities throughout the west Georgia piedmont, especially in towns located along the railroad lines. With good access to freight trains, Carroll County had the largest number of hosiery mills in Georgia in 1935, including three in Villa Rica and three in Carrollton. Hosiery production was initially concentrated in the northern states during the nineteenth and early 20th centuries but began to follow the cotton mills south in the 1920s, in part to avoid labor unions. Southern hosiery companies could lower production and labor costs by purchasing modern high-speed, power-driven circular knitting machines that could be operated by women, rather than by men who might demand higher pay.


Carroll County mills produced seamless hosiery and socks made of cotton, silk, and rayon for men, women, children, and infants. Similar to cotton mills, Carroll County’s hosiery companies employed primarily white women and men until federal laws forced them to integrate in the 1960s. However, they did not build company towns, providing more autonomy to employees. With the growing popularity of automobiles, workers could now drive to work from homes in the country or other towns.

While many hosiery mills continued to operate through the 1980s and 1990s, almost all are gone now. However, several of these hosiery buildings survived and are being remodeled as important community landmarks, including the loft apartments in the Lawler Hosiery mill on Bradley Street in Carrollton.

Cotton Mill Expansion after the Civil War

The number of textile mills in Georgia increased dramatically during the late nineteenth century. Atlanta Constitution editor Henry Grady fervently called for a Cotton Mill Campaign to rebuild the region after the Civil War and “bring the cotton mills to the cotton fields.” In his vision of the “New South,” railroad lines would link cotton mills to markets in the South and the North.

companystoren33f7a

Northern mill owners and southern entrepreneurs, attracted by lower taxes, cheaper labor, and the absence of a labor union, embraced this vision to establish industry in the South. By 1880, Georgia boasted the largest number of spindles and looms among all southern states. The new mills were larger, multi-story brick buildings increasingly operated by steam-power and full of efficient new machinery that produced yarn, cloth, and other textile products. Many Georgia cotton mills built company towns to maximize their profits and manage their employees. Workers rented homes from the company, the size based on the number of family members working at the mill; bought food and supplies at inflated prices from the company store; attended the mill church; and sent their children to the mill school. By 1900, 92 percent of mill workers in the South lived in company-owned mill villages. Textile mills employed primarily white workers, both adults and children, in the factories. Men obtained higher-paying jobs as supervisors and mechanics, while women and children operated the machines.

01581v

In the segregated South, African Americans faced fewer opportunities and lower pay: black men worked “on the yard,” in the cotton house, or in janitorial work, while their wives and daughters could only find employment as domestics in the homes of white families in the mill village.

Children in the Mills

Company photo at Troup Factory on Flat Shoals Creek circa 1890. Note the children, who likely labored in the Factory, on the right. Photo Courtesy of the Troup County Archives

Child labor is the employment of children as wage earners. It became a serious social problem during the Industrial Revolution in the United Kingdom during the 1700s and spread to America as it became industrialized. Children, many below the age of 10, were employed by textile factories and forced to work long hours under dangerous and unhealthy conditions for very little pay. Charles Dickens’ novel Oliver Twist (1837-1839) was written as a commentary on the evils of child labor and exposed the problems associated with child labor to the masses. Social reformers condemned child labor because of its effects on the health and welfare of children.

Group of Massachusetts Mill workers
Photo of a tough-looking group of Massachusetts Mill workers at Lindale, Georgia, likely taken by labor-reformer Louis Wickes Hine. The boys in front could scarcely be older than 10 years old. Photo Courtesy of the Library of Congress.

Lewis Wickes Hine, a northern labor reformer, visited Georgia’s textile mills to document their use of child labor and the squalid living conditions that most employees were forced to endure. Using disguises and aliases to infiltrate the mills, Hines managed to capture hundreds of images of child laborers in Georgia’s mills. Plants in Rossville, Rome, Lindale, and Columbus were especially prominent in his publications. The outrage caused by the photos that Hines took eventually led to Congressional action. In 1916, Congress passed a law setting standards for the hiring of children by industries involved in interstate or foreign commerce. The standards included setting the minimum age for work in factories and mills at fourteen, an eight-hour day, and a forty-eight hour week. The law prohibited nightwork for children under the age of sixteen.

Photo of a Rome Mill House
Hines’ photos also captured the squalid living conditions that mill workers were forced to endure. This image shows a pair of duplex houses rented by Floyd Cotton Mills employees. Note the ramshackle construction of the homes and their proximity not only to the noisy mill (seen in the background) but also a railroad spur. Photo Courtesy of the Library of Congress.

Factory owners were angered because the standards interfered with their ability to make a profit from the labor of their most underpaid employees – the children working in the mills. Families with children working in the mills were also angry because many depended on the children’s meager incomes in order to support their families. In 1918, the Supreme Court of the United States declared the law unconstitutional. In 1924, Congress passed an amendment to the constitution allowing federal laws to be passed to protect working children under the age of eighteen. This amendment failed to receive the required approval of three-fourths of all the states. Finally, the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 helped to promote child labor reform. This law declared that children over the age of sixteen may be employed in any occupation except those declared hazardous by the U.S. secretary of labor. Children fourteen and fifteen years old were permitted to work in only a limited number of occupations outside of school hours. This law firmly established the constitutional legality of child labor laws.

Newer posts »
css.php